Nāstika, Nirīśvaravāda, and atheism in the West

Nastik Why I am Not An Atheist by Kushal Mehra chronicles the transformative journey of a modern Indian skeptic who initially embraced Western neo-atheism. The book begins with the protagonist’s disillusionment with religious dogma and his subsequent adoption of Western neo-atheism, characterized by a staunch denial of theism and a critique of religion’s influence on society.

 

Excerpt from the book:

Human diversity is not just about physical characteristics, languages, and civilizations but also about thinking and beliefs. The range of this diversity is found in the variety of perspectives that people have, providing a wide range of ideas, philosophies, and worldviews. This diversity affects the sphere of disbelief (atheism), where diverse individuals and cultures offer their interpretations and understanding of the lack of belief in a greater force.

One of the most scintillating parts of human thought, diversity is the chance for debate and the interchange of ideas. When people with different viewpoints get together, they can have meaningful dialogues that question preconceptions, extend horizons, and stimulate intellectual progress. This also extends to atheism. There are numerous perspectives within atheistic philosophy, from philosophical and scientific opinions to moral and ethical considerations. Dialogue with atheists from varied backgrounds allows for investigating these ideas, leading to a fuller knowledge of atheism and its various facets.

Furthermore, this diversity of atheism reflects the complexities of the human experience and the various routes that have led people to question the existence of a superior entity. Some atheists may have concluded by critically examining religious texts, scientific investigations, or personal experiences. Others may have become atheists due to peer pressure, cultural influences, or other societal issues. This variety of paths enhances atheistic thought and demonstrates the complex nature of human reasoning and the various forces that create our opinions.

The beauty of human thought, diversity is also evident in the numerous philosophical frameworks that atheists use to make sense of the world. Atheism can coexist with multiple philosophical positions, such as secular humanism, existentialism, naturalism, and skepticism. Each framework contributes insights and contributions to the study of existence, ethics, and the human predicament. Accepting variety allows for a thorough examination of the implications and applications of atheism, resulting in a more robust intellectual conversation.

Furthermore, the beauty of diversity in the human mind is its ability to question preconceived assumptions and promote personal progress. When we encounter different points of view, we are encouraged to challenge our opinions and biases, which fosters empathy and promotes a more inclusive worldview. This also applies to atheism. Engaging with different atheistic perspectives allows us to rethink our assumptions, critically examine our beliefs, and broaden our understanding of the world. As a result, we have a more extensive and more nuanced understanding of the complexity of atheism and the human experience.

Atheism is a critical aspect of the enormous tapestry of human beliefs and ideologies, undermining the fabric of religious concepts. Atheism, typically regarded as a rejection of the presence of deities, manifests itself in various ways throughout civilization.

 

(Excerpt is published with permission from the publisher, BluOne Ink)